Hind Advocates is a group of lawyers operating in High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. It provides Corporate legal advices and handles client cases in all subjects such as civil and criminal, arbitration, services and labour laws.
Where dispute between the parties predominantly or overwhelmingly seems to be of a civil nature and dispute is a private one between two private parties, even though offences alleged are non-compoundable, offences can be compounded. The jurisdiction to compound the offences and quash the FIR lies within the powers of High Court of the concerned…
Allegations of illicit relations and love affairs of husband raised by the wife in her written statement and in such case if she fails to leave any evidence in support of her allegations to prove the same, it amounts will amount to ‘cruelty’ even when such a plea is not taken in the divorce petition,…
Mutation of property in revenue records are fiscal proceedings and does not create or extinguish title nor has it any presumptive value on title.
In the case of divorce with mutual consent, wife can give up her right of maintenance or permanent alimony or stridhan, but she cannot give up rights which vest in the daughter insofar as maintenance and other issues are concerned.
Harassment of a woman by unlawful demand of dowry also partakes the character of ‘cruelty’ and this is a sufficient ground for divorce.
The question whether an employee deserves to be paid interest on the delayed payment of various retiral benefits and the answer to this question is ‘yes’. A writ in the nature of Mandamus is also legally maintainable to seek interest on the delayed payment as per the law laid on by the Honourable of Apex…
LAW RELATING TO REGISTRATION OF AN FIR IN INDIA By : Vijay Kumar Kaushal, Advocate Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh Criminal Procedure Code under Section 154 of Criminal Procedure Code ( in short Cr P C ) contains a provision relating to registration of an FIR. It says, every information relating to…
AIR 1987 SUPREME COURT 371 SUPREME COURT (From : Gujarat)* O. CHINNAPPA REDDY , J. and G. L. OZA, J. Civil Appeal No. 447 (N) of 1973, D/-21-11-1986 Kalyan Mills Ltd Appellant v. Union of India and others Respondents. Income-Tax Act (11 of 1922), S.46(2), S.46(5A)– Recovery of arrears of Income-tax, Excess Profit Tax, Business Profit Tax- Suit for, by…
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ( Before : Abhay Manohar Sapre and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ. ) HINDUSTAN ANTIBIOTICS LIMITED — Appellant Vs. MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA) AND OTHERS — Respondent Civil Appeal No. 10203 of 2018 Decided on : 04-10-2018 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Order 27 Rule…
Public policy l is one issue which is a threat to the arbitral awards since courts can interfere into any award on the ground of public policy. In India Supreme Court of India has minimised the possibility of such unlimited interference by the courts, by its various judgements. In a recent judgment dated04.09.2014 at three…
