Reply: The trial court directed both the parties to maintain status quo regarding possession. In these circumstances, in this case you alleged that you have been dispossessed from the premises in question, it would be expected of you to lead cogent and convincing evidence to establish your possession. In case of violation of interim injunction, the appropriate remedy for you would be to have recourse to the provisions of Order 39, Rule 2 CPC. In the absence of any specific and unambiguous finding regarding possession, the police cannot be directed to restore possession of the plaintiff.
Author: Hind Advocates
Hind Advocates is a group of lawyers operating in High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. It provides Corporate legal advices and handles client cases in all subjects such as civil and criminal, arbitration, services and labour laws.